Senator Demands 40% Boost in Defense Budget, Military Pay Hike

Share this article

Senator Demands 40% Boost in Defense Budget, Military Pay Hike

Senator Demands 40% Boost in Defense Budget, Military Pay Hike

Breaking: Senator Pushes for 40% Defense Budget Hike & Salary Doubling

In a high-stakes Senate sessionSenator Faisal Vawda demanded a 40% surge in Pakistan’s defense budget and doubling of armed forces salaries, citing escalating regional threats. The proposal comes as tensions with India persist and internal security challenges grow.

Key Demands

💰 40% defense budget increase – One of the largest jumps in history.
💵 Double salaries for Army, Navy, Air Force personnel.
🛑 Halt non-essential development spending – Redirect funds to security.


Why Such a Sharp Increase?

1. Rising Security Threats

  • Indian border tensions (post-Balakot, Kashmir standoff).

  • Cross-border terrorism concerns.

  • Afghan instability spillover risk.

2. Military Modernization Needs

  • JF-17 upgrades, new drones, naval fleet expansion.

  • Countering India’s S-400, Rafale jets.

3. Inflation & Morale Boost

  • Current salaries eroded by 30%+ inflation.

  • “Our soldiers deserve parity with regional forces” – Vawda.


Senate Reactions: Support & Opposition

✅ Pro-Increase Voices

  • Senator Irfan Siddiqui“We must prioritize security over roads when under threat.”

  • Ex-Finance Minister Ishaq Dar“India’s proxies won’t stop unless we show strength.”

❌ Counterarguments

  • Senator Sherry Rehman“Butchers of children aren’t freedom fighters—but can we afford this?”

  • Economists warn: 40% hike may crash IMF talks, spike debt.


What Would a 40% Hike Mean?

📊 Current defense budget: ~8�������(2024−25).📈∗∗�����4011.2 billion.
⚠ Trade-offs: Possible cuts to health, education, CPEC projects.


Global Context

🌍 India spends 3x more on defense ($72B in 2024).
🇨🇳 China’s model: Heavy military investment + economic growth.
💣 Ukraine lesson“Weak militaries invite aggression” – Vawda.


Possible Outcomes

✔ Stronger deterrence vs. India/Afghan threats.
❌ Fiscal crisis risk if revenue doesn’t match spending.
⚖️ Balancing act needed – Guns vs. butter debate rages.


Final Analysis

This isn’t just about money—it’s a strategic crossroads. While threats are real, Pakistan must weigh security vs. survival economics.


Disclaimer:

The information shared in this post is for informational purposes only. BestPakMag is not affiliated with the organization/institution offering the opportunity and we do not guarantee the authenticity, availability, or outcome of any scholarship, program, or offer. Please verify details from the official source before taking any action. We are not responsible for any loss, misunderstanding, or dispute arising from this information.

Share this article